In Praise of “Civil Religion”
“Civil Religion” has a bad name. Even Robert Bellah,
who popularized the term in 1967, no longer uses it because it has come
to connote right-wing desires to fuse church and state as in the case of
one proposed Constitutional amendment, meant to recognize the “sovereignty
of Christ.”
But religion is often understood, at least in part,
as the search for transcendent meanings. Surely we citizens have the right,
indeed the obligation, to place the workings of our governments and the
life of our nation — indeed, all nations — in the context of the transcendent.
What does our life as a nation, as a society, as the human race, mean?
The Declaration of Independence is full of theological
intimations. Even that entirely secular document, the US Constitution,
is based on religious assumptions arising from the Reformation and the
Enlightenment. Our best leaders articulate a wholesome vision of who we
are as a people, and how to place the events of the day into a larger pattern
of history that makes transcendent sense. In so doing, they — and we —
give voice to Civil Religion.
Thus, in his “Second Inaugural Address,” Abraham
Lincoln describes the unexpected magnitude of the horrors of the Civil
War and reverently places them in the context of a Power that moves in
history toward justice. He speaks without self-righteousness. He
urges reconciliation.
Martin Luther King Jr and many other American leaders
have written and spoken in this tradition, growing out of, and beyond,
a sense of chosenness, covenant, and millennial expectations.
Holidays like Independence Day, Memorial Day, and
Thanksgiving should function as bearers of transcendent meaning for us
as a diverse people, just as Yom Kippur, Christmas, Ramadan, Holi, and
the solstices recall the sacred as disclosed within specific traditions.
Ceding to extremists the right to ponder questions
about, and to celebrate, the meaning of our national life is like vacating
citizenship. We become isolated individuals without a sense of participating
with each other in honoring the meaning of America. Abandoning civil religion
because it is misused is like a Christian despising his own faith because
some in its name are sexist, racist, or homophobic.
We need to recover a sense of respectful public
life beyond partisan divisions and special interests. Instead of disdaining
Civil Religion, we should seek to articulate it as a religion of mutual
responsibility and joyous pluralism.
Sacred Citizenship
To embrace the Memorial
Day and the Fourth of July, we reprint a naturalization ceremony address
from November 18, 1988. Scholars have called the use of religious categories
to interpret public life “civil religion” and “the religion of the Republic.”
New citizens of the United
States, Judge Saffels, members of the bar, and guests:
Last week I sat in another
court, with my eight-year old son, Benjamin. It was very impressive: the
Supreme Court of the United States of America, in session. I pointed out
to my son the first black justice and first woman justice in US history,
so someday he can tell his children he saw this historic court.
As I sat watching, I thought
of being here today, in this court, with you and this day which is so historic
in your personal life history. This is also very impressive: you have chosen
to become citizens of the United States of America. So I want to say three
things about citizenship for your consideration. I thought a great deal
about these things as I showed my son the monuments and museums of our
nation’s capital, in his first visit to Washington, DC. My thoughts are
about loyalty, freedom, and greatness.
The first thought is about
loyalty. It is obvious as you swear fealty to the United States that your
national loyalty is first and foremost to this country, to its laws, its
people, and its future. But citizenship is not just obeying laws. It is
also a sense of ownership. You now have the right to call this country
yours.
As I took my son through the
many buildings of the Smithsonian Museum, and I thought at the same time
of standing here before you, I sensed pride at our achievements, so well
displayed at the Air and Space Museum, Benjamin's favorite. As citizens,
we own our nation’s accomplishments. But the National Gallery, the new
Oriental and African art museums, and even the museum of American history
made something else clear: being a US citizen means also being a world
citizen. You still own important memories and traditions of your native
land which no one wants you to discard, because they can enrich the meaning
of America as you contribute them to the community. America’s greatness
lies in part in the innovation from immigrants who brought their backgrounds,
talents, and skills to these shores. After all, except for the Native Americans,
we are all immigrants or children of immigrants.
This became very clear earlier
this month, when for the first time in American history, representatives
of twelve religions gathered in mutual recognition, of all places, here
in Kansas. American Indians, Bahá’ís, Buddhists, Christians,
Hindus, Jains, Jews, Muslims, Shintoists, Sikhs, Unitarian Universalists,
Zoroastrians and others met and celebrated their diversity as part of the
fabric of this continent. The last such gathering was in 1893, as part
of the Chicago world’s fair; but then the distinguished representatives
had to be imported for the occasion. Now they are here all the time: they
are American, and our nation is richer for them.
American loyalty means, to
emphasize, not just obedience to US laws, but a sense of ownership of this
nation's heritage while maintaining reverence for the traditions of one's
native land that you choose to continue to honor.
These days, loyalty also means
planetary citizenship. The stock market crash last year demonstrated the
global interconnectedness of the financial centers of the world. Here in
the American heartland, we send grain around the world, and purchase imported
products of all sorts. But planetary citizenship is not merely economic
interdependence. It is the recognition that our fate as a nation depends
on the well-being of all other nations. The horrible side of this reality
is that we cannot be protected from nuclear war anywhere in the world,
that the depletion of the atmospheric ozone affects all nations — our ecological
unity. The blessed side of this reality is that, with vastly increased
communications, the possibility exists for us to come to understand each
other, and enjoy each other, as we work together for a healed planet.
The loyalty you pledge to
the United States of America is also an ownership of your own special past,
a door open to full planetary participation.
The second idea I want to
discuss is freedom. Of all the structures in Washington, I love none
more than the Jefferson Memorial. Perhaps it is because I work in the field
of religion, I especially prize Thomas Jefferson’s careful appreciation
for the distinct roles of religion and government. On one hand, the view
that “the God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time” means
that our freedoms are not granted by the government, but by the very order
of nature; that governments are instituted merely to secure these freedoms.
On the other hand, Jefferson, in promoting the separation of church and
state, remarked that it does him no harm whether his neighbor believes
in no god or twenty: It neither robs my pocket nor breaks my leg, he said.
Most odious to him was the custom of the state, through taxation, supporting
churches that individual citizens did not support.
The subsequent American consensus
has been that religion is so important, the state must generally not interfere
with its free exercise; and on the other hand, that religious tests may
not be imposed upon its citizens, thus strengthening voluntary religion
and separating government from religious intolerance. Personally, for me,
freedom is first of all religious freedom, which permits me to act in accord
with my conscience and conception of duties to a power far higher than
even the most awesome majesty of the state. My understanding of what is
sacred, that on which my life depends, is protected by the state, ennobling
the free discourse about the most important of all concerns.
Thus as an American citizen,
among the precious freedoms you enjoy, is freedom of religion — you may
follow any path, or no path; your conscience is protected as an American.
As an American, you are free.
This brings me to the third
idea, American greatness. Now Americans can be very petty. The last presidential
campaign makes this painfully clear. Nonetheless, at times a special
capacity moves us above the conflicts and divisions of the
day into a remarkable breath of acceptance and understanding — beyond self-righteousness
into mutual focus and compassion.
In Washington, I thought about
this especially when we visited the Lincoln Memorial and I reread Lincoln’s
Second Inaugural Address and was moved, as I always am. He spoke during
the greatest crisis in American history, in the midst of the most terrible
war the nation has ever known. His role was to preserve the union, and
in so doing, he freed the slaves of the south.
But this alone is not what
I mean by greatness. What astonishes is that he was able to look at the
events around him and understand them as part of a pattern of meaning,
a process, a flow of history, and to rise above even his own leadership
of one side against the other in the battle, to extend compassion to all.
Listen to a few of his eloquent
sentences as he speaks to the entire nation of the warring sides:
“Both read the same Bible,
and pray to the same God; and each invokes his aid against the other .
. . . The prayers of both could not be answered; that of neither has been
answered fully.
The Almighty has his own purposes.
If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which,
in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued
through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to
both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom
the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine
attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to him?
Fondly do we hope — fervently
do we pray — that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away.
Yet if God wills that it continue,
until all the wealth piled up by the bondman’s two hundred and fifty years
of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with
the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three
thousand years ago, so still must it be said, ‘the judgments of the Lord
are true and righteous altogether.’”
And then, having placed the
war in dreadful perspective, displaying the evil of slavery and its consequences,
Lincoln concludes his address with these immortal words:
“With malice toward none;
with charity for all; with firmness in the right as God gives us to see
the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the
nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for
his widow, and his orphan — to do all which may achieve and cherish a just
and lasting peace, among ourselves and with all nations.”
This generosity and understanding
is what I call American greatness. Our news seems too often to fall into
pieces, not patterns. Yet American greatness discerns a larger meaning
in the events that tie us together, and Lincoln is the great example of
articulating that meaning in national history.
In my own lifetime, and in
the lives of many citizens whom you now join, no experience has been more
wrenching than the Vietnam war. One of my reasons for going to Washington
last week, and to take my son, was to see the Vietnam Memorial, near the
Lincoln Memorial. One hardly notices it at first. It is a wall underground.
One slowly walks into the grave and reads one name on the first black reflecting
panel, then two on the next, three, and finally as one descends all
the way, the panel is eight feet high filled with names of those whose
lives are gone. And as one continues walking, one finally emerges
above ground again, having passed through the awful experience, seeing
people touching, kissing the names of their loved ones, tracing the names
on paper. It is a memorial of American greatness, that despite the conflict
of the war, abroad and at home, healing is taking place.
America is not without flaws
and problems. I hope you will help in resolving them. But America is great
because of its capacity to push through to healing and generosity, to discern
a larger pattern in which we all participate, through which healing arises.
So this week, as I enjoy the
company of this court, and welcome you to citizenship today, I offer the
ideas of loyalty, freedom, and greatness, and pray that your participation
in the ongoing life of this nation may be blessed, as the nation may be
blessed by your citizenship. I took my son to Washington to see the monuments,
to learn in a new way what it means for him to be an American. Yet I also
told him that the greatest monuments of America are not the memorials in
Washington, as inspiring as they are: the truest memorials, calling us
to service and generosity, are America's loyal and free and great citizens
such as you and I and all of us may strive to be.
Historical note:
The phrase “sacred citizenship” in the title of this essay is a response
to “sacred kingship” of archaic peoples and the medieval “divine right
of kings.” |