A History
of
the Kansas City Interfaith Council
REVISED 2005 February
This is not a history of interfaith
activity in Kansas City, or even an account of the work of CRES, which
is far more extensive than that of the Interfaith Council, which was just
one of its many ongoing programs. These essays do, however, sketch the
Council and its context within the Kansas City area. While a number of
people made suggestions for what should be highlighted in this history--their
work gratefully incorporated--and additional comments are welcome, I am
responsible for the content except where indicated.
[photo above of 12 original
members and founder]
1989 May 11: The first meeting
of the Kansas City Interfaith Council. Standing: Unitarian Universalist
Elizabeth Gordon, Hindu Anand Bhattacharyya, Sikh Harbhajan
Chatha, Bahá'í Adrian Chandler, Jew Cantor
Paul Silbersher, Sufi Connie Rahima Sweeney, Pagan Mike Nichols,
Muslim
Dr
A Rauf Mir, Buddhist Fred Brandt,
Catholic Christian Sr Ruth
Stuckel, CSJ; kneeling: organizer
Vern Barnet,
American Indian
Nate Scartitt, Protestant Christian
Pastor David E Nelson.
In 1989, I had the pleasure of calling together
men and women from thirteen faith traditions to organize the Kansas City
Interfaith Council. Its first purpose was to make the metro area aware
of the fact that so many different faiths were practiced here: American
Indian, Bahá'í, Buddhist, Christian Protestant, Christian
Roman Catholic, Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Sufi, Unitarian Universalist,
Wiccan, and Zoroastrian.
The Council grew out of a continuing
tradition begun in 1985. Each year on the Sunday before Thanksgiving, folks
from different faiths gather to share the meaning of gratitude from their
various communities and a full meal with a text and symbolic foods to reflect
upon the American promise of religious freedom.* See the note on page 4,
“Membership Criteria.” On its planning committee, Vern had encouraged a
dozen Kansas City area residents to attend the first NAIN conference, held
in Wichita in 1988, and several of those at the conference became members
of the Interfaith Council.
Awards were begun with
the 1999 reorganization of the CRES Board under David Stallings. First
to receive recognition were the Hindu member of the Interfaith Council
Anand Bhattacharyya and Muslim member A Rauf Mir, MD, both who had served
from the beginning of the Council—in the following years, Mayor Kay Barnes,
Arthur S Brisbane and Bill Tammeus of The Kansas City Star, Mayor
Pro Tem Alvin Brooks, Congressman Dennis Moore, and Nelson-Atkins Director
Marc Wilson and, posthumously, his predecessor, Laurence Sickman.
In 1990, cooperating with the Kansas City Press
Club in a day-long conference on “Religion and the Media,” the group supported
developing new ways for newspapers, radio, and TV to report on the Heartland’s
increasing religious diversity.
2001 Sep 11, as planned, the Council
held a press conference to announce “The Gifts of Pluralism” meeting set
for late October. Unplanned, a TV monitor in the background displaying
the horrors unfolding that morning made vivid the increased importance
of interfaith work.
2001 Sep 16, in response to Kansas
Congressman Dennis Moore’s invitation, the Council helped to bring the
community together from both sides of the State Line in an observance to
recognize the devastation of 9/11 and affirm our mutual support for one
another.
Six weeks later, the Council opened
its two-day interfaith conference, over a year in the planning, attended
by 250 adults and youths from every faith mentioned plus those from Christian
Orthodox and Free-Thinker traditions.
From the conference, an auxiliary
group formed, Mosaic, which set about collecting stories from 70 area people
about their lives and faiths. Many of these gripping stories were scripted
into a play, “The Hindu and the Cowboy,” performed locally in several venues,
including last spring’s annual Harmony Week Luncheon. Mosaic also started
an interfaith book club and developed an “Interfaith Passport” which was
featured in The National Catholic Reporter.
From the unanimous “Declaration”
concluding the conference, the Council established three task forces —
on the environment, on personhood and on society — to bring the wisdom
of all the faiths to respond to the dangers of secularism.
In 2002, people from several organizations
joined with the Interfaith Council to lead the area in observing the first
anniversary of 9/11. With a website, CRES coordinated some fifty events
here. With a brass ensemble from the Kansas City Symphony, a day-long
central observance began at sunrise at the Ilus Davis Park pool between
City Hall and the Federal Justice Center. In a ceremony broadcast live,
every member of the Council poured water blessed by each tradition into
the pool, with water from the Ganges, the Nile, the Kaw, and dozens of
other rivers of the world, and with water collected at the 2001 conference
from 14 fountains in the Kansas City area. Then drawn from the pool was
a portion of the mixture, taken in procession with police escort to Grace
and Holy Trinity Cathedral.
During the day, the names of those
who died in the 9/11 horrors were read and people gathered to meditate
and pray. In the evening, with assistance from the Kansas City Opera, an
observance attended by Gov Holden and his family, was packed in the
Cathedral. The music included the Muslim Adhan (Call to Prayer), American
Indian chants, a Hindu hymn, a carefully–worded patriotic anthem, and a
choir of Jewish and Muslim children singing “Shalom, Salam.” A videotape
of the morning water ceremony was shown —tears to healing waters — and
Council members each used the mingled water as they contributed their tradition,
one by one, to the blessing of our community. Then workshops were offered
and the Kansas City Ballet presented a dance for the somber but redemptive
occasion.
From such work, CRES and the Council
became the subject of national media attention, including a half-hour CBS-TV
special, “Open Hearts, Open Minds.”
Still, most of the Council’s work has been routine,
such as providing speakers for groups who wish to learn about particular
faiths, whether a Sunday school class or training hospital chaplains. Special
programs like the 2004 October 13 conference for clergy and lay leaders
have also been offered.
Recognition of the area’s faith diversity
has led to expansion of faith representation on the boards of organizations
and in community events, such as the annual Martin Luther King Jr observances.
The Council’s mission is printed on
page 2. For clarity, it should be noted that Council members are not strictly
representatives. There is a Jewish member, and a Hindu member, a Buddhist
member, and so forth. We do not ask the members to represent their traditions
in any judicatory sense because this is an impossible task with so many
variations within each faith. But we do ask members to share news of their
communities and activities of interfaith interest.
My paradigm for the Council derives from my teacher
at the University of Chicago Divinity School, Mircea Eliade. He is sometimes
credited with studying religion sui generis, that is, in its own right.
Seminaries used to view non-Christian faiths in terms of Christian theology,
rather than in the ways each faith presents itself. In secular schools,
psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, and philosophers examined
religion through their own lenses, rather than allowing religion to be
studied as a distinctive discipline with its own unique methods.
For Eliade, the key to understanding
religion is the experience of the sacred. While utilizing the insights
of other disciplines, he insisted religion could not be reduced to any
one of them, nor a compilation or combination of them. Religion deserves
to be studied in its own right.
But people often assume that interfaith
work is about cooperation between faiths toward some socially significant
goal, whether it is folks of several traditions joining to build a Habitat
for Humanity house, ending racial discrimination, or pursuing
world peace.
Such efforts deserve praise and support.
But this parallels the anthropologists and theologians using their own
lenses instead of asking of religions, “What can you teach us?”
Organizations often want to employ
the Interfaith Council not to receive the wisdom of the world’s religions
but rather to deliver the organizations’ messages or services or gain the
Council’s support. That’s fine, but such specific intentions cannot replace
the larger work of folks of different faiths being open to the sacred.
The sacred cannot have any agenda placed on it; it is what creates the
agenda. The sacred is not a delivery vehicle; it is the driver.**
As a full-time volunteer, I have found interfaith
work to be richly rewarding. But with the exhaustion of my pension, and
my weak abilities as a fundraiser, the Council needs to seek other support.
Even before the 2001 “Gifts of Pluralism”
Conference, I thought that the Council needed to have an existence of its
own or be a program of an organization with sufficient funding to move
the Council forward. The Council appointed a committee to meet with representatives
of NCCJ, Harmony, and Community of Christ to consider such alternatives,
but the committee decided that no change then seemed appropriate.
For 2004, CRES was able to continue
supporting the Council with a $5,000 grant from the Kauffman Fund. The
Council has never had its own funding. This year [2004], with Simon Gatsby
as its manager, the Council was awarded a technical assistance grant from
a national interfaith organization, Religions for Peace—USA, and the ensuing
consultations should help the Council decide on its future.
Some have asked whether the attacks
from some leaders of one minority faith, with insinuations about my sexual
preferences as a way of undermining my status with another minority faith,
and using my columns in The Kansas City Star against me, was a factor
in my departure. No. I do hope, however, that with my valediction the Council
will be less affected by the animosity directed against me personally by
these few.
Working with the Council has been one of the greatest
pleasures and inspirations of my life, and I wish it and each member the
greatest blessings! Vern Barnet
* Venues have included the Grand Avenue Methodist
Church, the Village Presbyterian Church, Rockhurst University, All
Souls Unitarian Universalist Church, Saint James Lutheran Church, Unity
Temple on the Plaza, Shawnee Presbyterian Church, Grace and Holy Trinity
Episcopal Cathedral, Temple B’nai Jehudah, Central Baptist Theological
Seminary, Congregation Beth Shalom, the Community Christian Church, St
Monica Catholic Church, St Andrew Christian Church, and the Rime Buddhist
Center and Monastery.
**That said, it is important to recognize interfaith
groups that make contributions to civic life like the Kansas City Interfaith
Peace Alliance, Project Equality, Worker Justice, the Independence Ministerial
Alliance, the Kansas City Office of the National Conference for Community
and Justice, Hatebusters, Raytown Community Inter-Faith Alliance, and Wyandotte
Interfaith Sponsoring Council. Interfaith in the sense that they involve
people from several traditions, but not in the sense that their focus is
the sacred as revealed through different faiths.
Congregational Partners, a program
of KC Harmony, now involves 29 congregations and is growing. It provides
opportunities for committed people of various faiths to meet repeatedly,
develop friendships through various activities and learn about their traditions.
Pathways promotes interfaith understanding through a monthly discussion
and annual dinner. |
Kansas
City’s
Organizational
Failure
The Kansas City area has never
had an organization that embraced all congregations. Efforts to remedy
this situation have failed to date. Congregations are fragmented by race
and ethnicity, economic outlook, denomination, the State Line and other
jurisdictional boundaries. Hundreds of thousands of dollars have been wasted
on foolish attempts to unite religious organizations for social purposes
through electronic means, and with few exceptions the philanthropic community
has failed to see how important the spiritual life of the community is
and how it can be assisted in ways that favor no particular faith and respect
the important American tradition of separation of “church and state.”
MICA, the Metropolitan InterChurch
Agency, dissolved in the 1970s from disagreements over issues such as abortion.
Its focus had included social service and was not broadly interfaith.
In 1990, Maurice
Culver, then head of Project Equality, took a sabbatical to study metro-wide
religious associations in other cities and to explore whether one might
be possible for Kansas City. His reluctant conclusion was that financial
support for such an organization does not exist here.
Since 1990,
there’ve been other proposals and studies with the same result. The 1996
Religion/Spirituality Cluster of Mayor Cleaver’s Task Force on Race Relations
unanimously issued a recommendation (which I drafted) establishing such
a body, but instead of finding new money as specified in the recommendation,
three existing organizations were tasked to carry out the mandate with
insufficient funding, another dead end.
In 1999, at
the urging of several friends, I prepared an “Outline for a Study: An Umbrella
for Kansas City Area Religious Organizations” citing Culver and other work.
The proposal was not funded.
In 2000, an
ad hoc group was asked to plan an interfaith ceremony to conclude the Kansas
City sesquicentennial “peak week.” After months of work, the group had
to cancel the event because such an effort required a network, infrastructure,
and funding that does not exist.
Also that year,
folks meeting at Heart of America United Way began to wrestle with the
myriad problems that our community faces and the opportunities lost by
not having an umbrella organization. In the spring of 2003, HAUW concluded
another study with the same result.
Many of us hoped
that Spirit of Service would develop into such infrastructure, but expected
funding never appeared and the organization effectively folded in 2002.
In 2003, during
the debate on the demolition of B’nai Jehudah’s facility on Holmes, another
conversation erupted briefly about a diversity center there or elsewhere,
to serve all religious communities, but money never materialized for the
project.
While I have strongly
supported the development of an umbrella organization, I have also tried
to be clear that this is a role that CRES, created in 1982, is unable to
play, although we have been called to do so on several occasions. CRES,
which hosted the Interfaith Council, was primarily an interfaith network
representing each religion rather than each congregation or faith-based
group (more of a Senate than a House model), and did not assume the other
roles or polity either of an umbrella organization or a Council of Congregations.
See “Models”
on page 4. -vb
THE KANSAS
CITY
INTERFAITH
COUNCIL’S MISSION
1. to develop deeper understanding among members of the Council of
each other's faiths and traditions, and to foster appropriate bilateral
and multilateral interreligious conversations
2. to model religious values (especially mutual respect and cooperation)
in a society which often seems non-religious and intolerant
3. to provide resources, networking, and programs to increase appreciation
for religious diversity, and
4. to work with media and with educational and religious leaders and groups
in promoting accurate and fair portrayal of the faiths.
Fundraising and political or social action activities are not normally
the focus of the Council, though the Council may refer suggestions about
such matters to other, more appropriate organizations.
Interfaith Council
[Dec 31, 2004]
Simon Gatsby,
manager
American Indian
- The Rev Kara Hawkins
Bahá'í
- Barb McAtee
Buddhism -
Lama Chuck Stanford
Christianity,
Protestant - The Rev Wallace S Hartsfield
Christianity,
Roman Catholic - George M Noonan
Hinduism -
Kris Krishna
Islam - A Rauf
Mir, MD
Judaism - Rabbi
Jacques Cukierkorn
Paganism -
Caroline Baughman
Sikh Dharma
- Karta Purkh S Khalsa
Sufism - Ali
Kadr
Unitarian Universalism
- The Rev Kathy Riegelman
Zoroastrianism
- Daryoush Jahanian, MD
Official Vedanta
Observer – Uma
Chair – The
Rev David E Nelson, DMin
Convener Emeritus
– The Rev Vern Barnet, DMn
Observers from
World Headquarters
The Rev W Grant
McMurray, Community of Christ
The Rev William
C Miller, Church of the Nazarene
The Rev Sharon
Connors, Unity School of Christianity
1989 Criteria
for Membership
in the Interfaith
Council
This note supplements the
main text.
Religious
distinctions are messy and criteria for membership in an interfaith group
is to some extent arbitrary. The 1989 goal was to recognize each distinctive
faith tradition in Kansas City without regard to size. However, because
of its Christian majority, both a Catholic and a Protestant were invited
to join the Council. Attempts then to offer a seat to an Orthodox Christian
were rebuffed. Early attempts to seat a Freethinker were unsuccessful.
Because Sufism in Kansas City had no organizational tie to Islamic organizations
and is syncretistic in its approach, it was regarded as distinctive and
thus a Sufi was invited to join the Council. Unitarian Universalists derive
from the Christian tradition (as Christianity arose from Jewish origins)
but no longer defines itself as Christian, and its application in the World
Council of Churches was declined. Since the Canadian government, which
relates to religious groups differently than the US government does, recognizes
Unitarian Universalism as a distinctive group, a Unitarian Universalist
was asked to join the Council. But Mormonism, Adventism, Christian Science,
and other newer groups retain their Christian roots and thus have no separate
seat on the Council. Since the Jains in Kansas City participate in the
Hindu Temple, no separate seat for them seemed appropriate.
Also
guiding the Council’s composition was the list of faiths featured in the
Multifaith Calendar produced each year by an extraordinarily competent
committee. The Calendar does recognize one faith not on the Kansas City
Interfaith Council: Shinto, but no Shinto groups were evident in Kansas
City. The faiths of other members of the Council probably require no special
explanation for their inclusion.
In
addition to Council membership, an observer from Vedanta was arranged because
of her extraordinary service to interfaith understanding.
During
the 2001 conference planning, observers from each of the three denominations
with world headquarters here were added (Community of Christ, Church of
the Nazarene, Unity) and the later Council invited them to continue to
sit with the Council.
NETWORKING HUB 080325
a response to an inquiry about
the meaning of "network hub"
The networking
function of the Council seems so obvious to me I just don't know how to
describe it. It is the essence of the original Council mission item #3,
"to provide resources, networking, and programs to increase appreciation
for religious diversity" and to my mind is what networking means with the
resources and programs mentioned in that mission item.
I'll try this
way: If the Council were as visible as it could be, people would turn to
the Council for advice, programming, information, etc, because the Council
would be in the center ("hub") of interfaith activities in the metro. With
the 30 some organizations now doing interfaith work, such a function may
not be necessary, but then the question is, what is the function of the
Council if it is not doing these things? (Of course there are answers,
but they don't make sense to people not involved with interfaith work.)
With so many interfaith efforts, some kind of clearing-house or coordinating
agency makes sense to me, and I just don't know how I can make that any
plainer. The Council would be the Go-To place for folks with interfaith
interests, as it used to be. The Council might refer out to other groups
and cooperate with them, but the Council would ordinarily be the First
Stop for someone seeking assistance. To be successful, your staff person
must know the community well and have the trust of the community. Union
Station was once a train hub; if you traveled somewhere by train, regardless
of the line, you went to Union Station because all the rail companies had
lines there. I have already suggested background material and different
models for interfaith organizations at http://www.cres.org/pubs/HistoryofKCIC.htm
-- please see the section KC's organizational failure, and the section
on Models for Multi-Faith Groups.
I'm afraid this
is about all I can do at this point to answer your question. Perhaps an
organizational consultant might be able to clarify this for you better
than I am able to -- again, it seems so very obvious to me, I just don't
know how to explain it.
Vern Barnet
|
Models
for Multi-Faith Groups
See
“Kansas
City’s Organizational Failure”
The Rev Jane Heide prepared
a report in 2003 April for a task force convened by the Heart of America
United Way to see if sufficient support existed within the community to
to create an alliance of faith-based organizations in the Kansas City metropolitan
area. The group, composed of clergy and officials of several non-profit
organizations with an interest in interfaith work, met a number of times,
drew upon previous studies (see page 2), and asked Heide for a new survey
of other cities and their interfaith organizations. Because the models
Heide identified might be useful for future work, they are excerpted from
a 2003 October 9 summary. A complete copy of the summary is available by
request. [Bracketed materials in blue are
later CRES comments.]
Models for Interfaith Coordination
· The
Understand and Appreciate Model – This approach, characterized by members
of diverse faith groups coming together to share perspectives and learn
more about each other, is best represented by the CRES organization, headed
by Vern Barnet. CRES sponsors an Interfaith Council, which meets regularly
to promote increased understanding among the thirteen major faith groups
in Kansas City. In October 2001, CRES held a pluralism conference, and
established ongoing workgroups related to faith perspectives on personal,
social and environmental issues. In addition, CRES has a programmatic arm,
called Mosaic, which promotes a book club and is working on an interfaith
“story project.”
[While understanding is important, it is multi-faith relationships that
build community strength, a purpose of which is to access wisdom from Primal,
Asian, and Monotheistic faiths as we face the three
great crises of our time: in the environment, in what it means
to be a person, in how society
should govern itself. In this model, interfaith is seen as essential to
the health of the planet, the individual, and society and civilization
itself. Interfaith understandings and relationships in our secularistic
culture offer us the healing of such profound awareness of the sacred that
we live with awe, gratitude, and service.]
·
The Organizational Support Model – This approach was being considered
by the Center for Management Assistance (CMA) as it applied for federal
funds to provide technical, grant-writing help to faith-based organizations.
The task force supported Carol Suter in her grant application process.
However, the proposal was not funded, and CMA itself eventually went out
of business.
· The Cyberspace Model – SOS represents this approach with its
internet capabilities and its data base of 2,401 faith-based organizations
in the 11-county Kansas City metropolitan area. This data base is
now a part of the Community Resource Network (CRN), and Linda Nixon serves
on the CRN board. The task force recognized the potential of this
service for communication among faith-based organizations as well as for
matching social service needs with faith community resources.
·
The Special Project Model – This approach encompasses the many efforts
in Kansas City that involve a joining of a specific group of faith-based
organizations around a particular issue or project. The Mainstream
Coalition, led by Bob Meneilly, and the Church Community Organization (CCO),
led by Warren Adams-Leavitt, are two examples of such focused efforts.
· The Alliance Model – This approach is the closest to what
Neal Colby proposed, and could be an umbrella for the work done in accordance
with the other four models. As Neal described it, such an alliance
would be congregationally based, and could provide a structure for ongoing
communication and information-sharing among faith-based organizations.
In his vision, it could also serve as a point of contact for those wishing
to access faith communities, as well as a representational group offering
a public voice of faith-based concerns within the metropolitan community.
[The
Social Service Model – This model arises from responses
to accute community needs, such as hunger and homelessness. Even when a
particular faith group spearheads such efforts, support and participation
are from several or many faiths. Habitat for Humanity and Unbound (formerly
the Christian Foundation for Children and Aging) are examples.]
Three Recommendations and
Conclusion
Considering organizational
models within Kansas City and examples from other cities, the task force
came to three conclusions about the characteristics of a potential interfaith
coordinating group for the Kansas City area.
· First, if such a group were to be formed, it should be based on
congregations, not judicatory bodies.
· Second, such a body would not provide social services, but rather
would harness energy to enhance the work of existing organizations.
· Third, internet connectivity would be integral to such an effort.
In spite of these conclusions, the task force did not come to a consensus
about the need for such a group or about its purpose, structure, and means
of support. At most, the task force could see the value of enhanced communication
among faith groups in order to support collective action around the community’s
human service needs.
[adapted from Jane Heide’s
summary] |
|
Before
the Council
By Larry Guillot
In the early part of the twentieth
century, few persons had many religious connections outside their own congregations.
Some organized connections existed between a small number of congregations,
generally through “ministerial alliances”. It is difficult to know
how many there were, where they were, and how they were grouped.
It appears they were mostly for ministers, mostly Protestant, with separate
groups for black ministers; in some cities, there was an alliance of rabbis.
We know that by the middle
1920’s there was an organized Council of Churches in Kansas City.
In the Missouri Valley collection of the K C Public library, there is a
handout promoting a “World Justice and World Peace Mobilization day” scheduled
for Nov 9, 1926.
In 1948, following the Second
World War, the K C Council of Churches had grown to 139 congregations representing
22 denominations. Another sign of progress was that it included black
and white congregations and denominations, an expression of the incipient
civil rights movement in our community.
In 1964, a “Metropolitan Council
of Churches” was formed, merging a Kansas City Kansas Council with the
Kansas City Missouri Council. While the “ecumenical movement” among
Christian denominations was gaining strength—witness the new World Council
of Churches (1948), the National Council of Churches (1950) along with
our Metropolitan Council, at the same time the Roman Catholic Church, some
Orthodox bodies and many fundamentalist evangelical bodies chose not to
join any of these councils.
Gratefully, in Kansas City,
we had for many years a local chapter of the National Council of Christians
and Jews, which began nationally in 1928, following the failed presidential
campaign of Alfred Smith. And we had the pioneering efforts of the
“Panel of American Women,” composed of Jewish, Catholic and Protestant
women who initiated interfaith dialogue and promoted “Brotherhood Week”
in our area.
In 1964-65, WDAF hosted a
monthly radio show called “Trialogue, featuring a minister, priest and
rabbi in an early form of interfaith dialogue.
In 1967, the Metropolitan
Council of Churches was replaced by an expanded organization, the Metropolitan
Inter-Church Agency, “MICA” which included Roman Catholics and had direct
connection with denominational, judicatory leaders. Sadly,
it did not have Jewish membership. It was focused on social action,
not doctrine, and involved a wide range of denominations and congregations
in joint social action activities. It came to an end in 1979, due in large
part to the withdrawal of Roman Catholic leadership, followed by others,
over issues of supporting abortion.
From the 1960s through the
end of the century, several paradoxical shifts in interfaith relations
occurred. On the one hand, the Consultation on Church Union, “COCU”, starting
out in 1962 became “Churches Uniting in Christ” in 2002. It never achieved
full intercommunion nor a common ministerial model between a large number
of participating Protestant churches, but it did achieve a great deal of
intercommunion and mutual acceptance of sacraments and ministries.
Considered great progress by some and a failure by others, it seemed to
have lessened denominational differences to many church goers.
During the same period, Roman
Catholics, nationally and internationally, created a series of formal dialogues
with many Protestant denominations, the Orthodox, Judaism, Islam and nonbelievers.
But Christian ecumenism and formal institutional dialogues seemed to lose
its steam. Judicatories and denominational institutions seemed to
shift to the background while most of the action came from individual congregations.
But the bigger picture was that inter-religious relations were morphing
into global interfaith connectedness. The study of world faiths became
a standard part of most universities’ curriculum.
Nevertheless, a widespread
cultural, political and religious divide was growing and has carried into
our own day, creating rifts within and well as between many of the world’s
global faiths. . . .
Excerpt from
a slightly revised version of remarks made at the 28th Annual Thanksgiving
Sunday Interfaith Thanksgiving Ritual Meal, November 18, 2012, by Larry
Guillot, on receiving "The Vern Barnet Interfaith Service Award." Used
with permission.
Ecumedia
was operating by a Catholic sister Shirly Koritnik (spelling?)at least
into 1988 out of the Westport Presbyterian Church.
|
|
Summary prepared
for
the Civic Council
The Gifts of
Pluralism--
Kansas City’s
First Interfaith Conference:
A Success —
A Model for
the Future
Overview. The “Gifts
of Pluralism” conference, held Oct. 27-28, 2001, on the Ward Parkway (State
Line) campus of the Pembroke Hill School, marked the metropolitan area’s
first interfaith conference and set the stage for future collaboration
among representatives of all faiths. Never before have so many people of
so many faiths gathered here to learn from each other and to plan for the
future.
Participation.
Over 250 people participated in the two-day event representing 15 faith
groups — American Indian, Bahá'í, Buddhist, Christian (Protestant,
Catholic, Orthodox), Free Thinkers, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, Sufi,
Unitarian Universalist, Wiccan, Zoroastrian.
Congressman
Dennis Moore and Congresswoman Karen McCarthy opened the conference, held
on State Line. Proclamations from Governors Graves and Holden and area
mayors were acknowledged.
Although
the conference was focused on Greater Kansas City, several out-of-town,
out-of-state, and foreign visitors learned about it and were drawn here.
About
two dozen high school and college students were involved. Students were
represented on each of the three Saturday panels. The Pembroke venue was
used to emphasize that we are all students learning from each other.
Eighteen
civic leaders such as Beth Smith and Bob Stephan had provided early planning
advice.
Program. A goal was
to focus on the diversity in Kansas City, so out-of-town celebrity speakers
were not engaged. The resources within our own area were displayed in many
ways, including the Saturday evening of drama, dance, and music.
A
process called “Appreciative Inquiry” was used throughout the two days
to help people, one-on-one and in small groups, encounter each other in
the depths of their faiths quickly and with mutual respect.
With preparation by four focus groups held last summer, three Saturday
panels of religious leaders addressed (1) environmental, (2) personal,
and (3) social failings of our time in the context of Kansas City, with
the resources of their respective traditions. On Sunday a panel on the
role of religion in Kansas City with leaders from government, media, business,
and the non-profit sector was featured, and a final panel discussed “Where
do we go from here?”
Many
faith groups held pre-conference open houses on Friday, and workshops
were offered on most faiths on Saturday. Sunday began with an interfaith
worship service. Throughout the conference, faith groups had displays and
information for registrants.
Concluding Declaration.
A 500-word declaration, edited from comments posted on a wall throughout
the conference, was unanimously adopted and signed in a ceremony using
the conference logo and water from rivers around the world and from area
fountains from Independence to Olathe.
The
Declaration begins, “This is an historic moment because never before have
people of so many faiths in the Kansas City area convened to explore sacred
directions for troubled times. Especially after the events of September
11, the need for our support for one another and the larger community is
clear and commanding.”
Evaluation. The formal
evaluation instrument and informal comments have been overwhelmingly favorable.
Participants
valued opportunities to build relationships, to learn about other faiths,
to experience the “Appreciative Inquiry” method, and to come to a better
understanding of our community.
A
Nov 1 Kansas City Star editorial began, “If other communities want an example
of how to conduct interfaith dialogue in this tense time among followers
of different religions, they should look at the recent ‘Gifts of Pluralism’
conference in Kansas City.” [See column right.]
Organizers. This conference
represents the cooperation of many organizations which understand the importance
of faith in the life of the community.
“The
Gifts of Pluralism” was conceived by the Kansas City Interfaith Council
under the auspices of CRES. Vern Barnet, president of CRES, was conference
president. Larry Guillot is CRES Board Chair.
Co-sponsors
were KC Harmony, NCCJ, and Spirit of Service. Churches with world headquarters
here (Community of Christ, the Church of the Nazarene, Unity School of
Christianity) were official observers at Interfaith Council planning meetings
and participated in the conference.
A
list of some 80 leaders and presenters (Clyde F Wendel, Stumbling
Deer, Bill Tammeus, Bilal Muhammed, Saraswati Shanker . . . ) is available
on our web site or by request, along with the members of the Interfaith
Council.
Funding was provided
by the Bank of America as Trustee of the George and Elizabeth Davis Trusts,
the Ewing M Kauffman Fund for Greater Kansas City, DST, the Norman
and Elaine Polsky Fund, the Bank of Blue Valley, and Community Christian
Church, with smaller gifts for scholarship funds from numerous individuals.
The facility was provided as an in-kind gift from Pembroke Hill School.
The conference fee was $75; donations made student scholarships and other
subsidies possible.
Additional information
(including extensive press coverage, the Concluding Declaration, and detailed
program and participants) is available on the CRES website (www.cres.org).
Conference notebooks (120 pages) with each faith’s section prepared locally,
are available for $22 each from the address below.
The printed version of this
document reproduces The Kansas City Star editorial, "An Interfaith Model,"
Nov 1, 2001
CRES,
promoting understanding among peoples of all faiths, Box 45414, KCMO 64171. |
“The Gifts
of Pluralism”
Concluding
Conference Declaration
This
is an historic moment because never before have people of so many faiths
in the Kansas City area convened to explore sacred directions for troubled
times. Especially after the events of September 11, the need for our support
for one another and the larger community is clear and commanding.
As members of the greater Kansas City community and guests, we have assembled
October 27-28, 2001, and worked together, worshipped together, enjoyed
each other, and learned much from each other.
We
do hereby declare our resolve to work towards making Kansas City, which
we often call the Heart of America, a model community – one that opens
its heart to the world. Here interfaith relationships shall be honored
as a way of deepening one’s own tradition and spirituality, and the wisdom
of many religions shall help to successfully address the environmental,
personal, and social crises of our often fragmented world.
* The gifts of pluralism have taught us that nature is to be respected,
not just controlled. Nature is a process that includes us, not a product
external to us that can just be used or disposed of. Our proper attitude
toward nature is awe, not utility. When we do use nature as we must – for
food, housing, and other legitimate purposes – we should do so with respect
and care, preserving its beauty and mindful of its connection to the Sacred
and ourselves.
* We have also learned that our true personhood may not be in the images
of ourselves constrained by any particular social identities. When we realize
this, our acts can proceed spontaneously from duty and compassion, and
we need not be unduly attached to results beyond our control.
* Finally, when persons in community govern themselves less by profit and
more by the covenant of service, the flow of history towards peace and
justice is honored and advanced.
We
declare that through our encounter with one another, we have discovered
that clearer directions for our several faiths and for our society at large
are needed and possible. In the name of our faiths, too often have prejudice
and injustice been perpetuated, and we know that bigotry and bias continue.
We pledge ourselves to guide our own faith communities in examining our
own beliefs and practices, so we may be sincere beacons for reducing the
incidence of unfair treatment of people, war, suffering, and other inhumanities
in our world.
The
work we have done this weekend is a turning point, we fervently hope, in
overcoming the misunderstandings that separate persons and communities
of faith. We commit ourselves to deepen our commitments to our own faith
communities and to enlarge our understanding of kinship by honoring the
faiths of others.
This conference, “The Gifts of Pluralism,” is thus the beginning of an
expanded conversation by which we may show both our humanity and our gratitude
in offering service to that which is Infinite and Ultimate, which we call
by many names but identify in our hearts as the Source from which we come,
to which we return, and which holds us in this present opportunity.
2001
October 28
unanimously
approved
by the entire
Conference
at the Pembroke
Hill School,
Ward Parkway
(State Line) Campus
NOTE: Over
250 people participated in the two-day event representing 15 faith groups
– American Indian, Bahá'í, Buddhist, Christian (Protestant,
Catholic, Orthodox), Free Thinkers, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, Sufi,
Unitarian Universalist, Wiccan, Zoroastrian. |
|
ADDENDUM 2005 October 14
in response
to the characterization in the
KC
Jewish
Chronicle
that the IFC was political
rather than theological
when it was a program of CRES,
and other errors
By: Rick Hellman, Editor
October 14, 2005
[response in blue by Vern
Barnet]
The Kansas City Interfaith
Council is marking its independence from Vern Barnet's CRES organization
with a Nov. 10 luncheon at the Marriott Muehlebach Hotel honoring the former
Unitarian Universalist minister. [I am not
a "former" Unitarian Universalist minister. I am a Unitarian Universalist
minister and have been so for 35 years with no interruption of this status.]
Barnet formed CRES as the
Center for Religious Experience and Study in 1982, and he convened the
Kansas City Interfaith Council in 1989. Both groups shared a mission of
bringing together members of various local faith communities.
[There are several problems with the wording here, but the main problem
is the omission that the Interfaith Council was one of several programs
supported by CRES.]
In 2000, Barnet dropped the
name Center for Religious Experience and Study but kept the CRES acronym
as the name of his non-profit group. Now he has spun off the Interfaith
Council, to stand alone as its own non-profit entity, with its own members
and steering committee. [The legal name of
CRES has been and remains "The World Faiths Center for Religious Experience
and Study, Inc."]
"It was his vision, and he
has nurtured these baby birds until they are able to fly and get out and
go do things on their own," said Gayle Krigel, who is one of the four co-chairs
of the "Table of Faiths" luncheon Nov. 10. The other three co-chairs are
Mahnaz Shabbir, Lama Chuck Stanford and Alvin Brooks. Kansas City, Mo.,
Mayor Kay Barnes is the event's honorary chairwoman.
The luncheon is a fund-raiser
for the Interfaith Council, with individual tickets starting at $45. To
request an invitation, send an e-mail note to Krigel at: gkrigel@kc.rr.com.
Or simply make out a check payable to Greater Kansas City Interfaith Council,
and mail it to Registration Chairwoman Jenny Morgan, Table of Faiths Celebration,
4205 SE Willow Ridge Drive, Blue Springs, Mo. 64014.
Krigel said Barnet would receive
the first "Table of Faiths" award at the luncheon, which the council hopes
to make an annual event.
"We're trying to craft the
wording of the award so that it will always be somebody who is working
for interfaith dialogue in the community," Krigel said.
In years past, the Jewish
representative [there never was a Jewish "representative"
or a Hindu "representative," etc -- only a Jewish member, a Hindu member
etc -- see A History of the KC Interfaith Council, paragraph 14] to
the Interfaith Council has been one of the community's pulpit rabbis.
[The first Jewish member was Cantor Paul Silbersher who served for several
years, not as a pulpit rabbi but as cantor.]
However, the Rabbinical Association has tapped Doug Alpert, special projects
director for the Jewish Community Relations Bureau/American Jewish Committee,
to be its representative on the reorganized council.
"I was told Vern had started
the former Interfaith Council, and that this group was looking to move
the council in a somewhat different direction, more focused on understanding
everybody's theology and less on politics," Alpert said. "That's a laudable
goal, and I am willing to be involved in that kind of effort." [See
COMMENT, column right.]
The new council will have
four at-large members, plus 14 members from the following faith groups:
American Indian spirituality, Baha'i, Buddhist, Protestant, Roman Catholic,
Hindu, Muslim, Sikh Dharma, Sufi, Unitarian, Vedanta Society, Pagan and
Zoroastrian. [I count 13 in the list;
curiously Mr Hellman omits the Jewish faith.]
For more information about
the Kansas City Interfaith Council, visit its new Web site, ww.kcinterfaith.org. |
|
COMMENT
ON THE IMPLICATION THAT MY INVOLVEMENT WITH THE INTERFAITH COUNCIL WAS
CONCERNED WITH "POLITICS."
A review of the history of
the KC Interfaith Council will show I did all in my power to focus the
work of the Council on theology and dialogue and not on politics.I
believe I was successful.
In fact, the mission statement
of the Council when it was a program of CRES was clear in excluding political
directions: "Fundraising and political or social action activities are
not normally the focus of the Council, though the Council may refer suggestions
about such matters to other, more appropriate organizations." This sentence
concluded the four-part mission statement of the group:
1. to develop deeper understanding among members of the Council of
each other's faiths and traditions, and to foster appropriate bilateral
and multilateral interreligious conversations
2. to model religious values (especially mutual respect and cooperation)
in a society which often seems non-religious and intolerant
3. to provide resources, networking, and programs to increase appreciation
for religious diversity, and
4. to work with media and with educational and religious leaders and groups
in promoting accurate and fair portrayal of the faiths.
Of course, some one may interpret
a moral statement as a political statement, but I am not aware of any partisan
stance the Council has ever taken, and no statement has ever been issued
in the name of the Council without the unanimous consent of its members.
In one case, a statement condemning the attacks of 9/11 was
unanimously agreed to, but later the American Indian member withdrew support
for the statement to avoid "condemning" anything. The statement certainly
was not political but intensely moral, to wit:
STATEMENT
ON THE TERRORIST ATTACKS
Members of the Kansas City Interfaith Council join with religious leaders
throughout the world in condemning the terrorism which struck the United
States Tuesday, September 11, 2001. Our prayers are with the victims and
their families and all of us affected by the enormity of these events.
Our faiths teach us to work for understanding, peace and justice. We call
upon all citizens of the region, whatever their faiths, to deepen their
commitments and to enlarge their compassion. We must open our hearts to
all peoples as we grieve together.
We are concerned that stereotyping may impede our sense of human kinship,
and fear may stifle our trust in those of other faiths. We need to grow
with mutual reassurance. This is why leaders of the various faiths here
join in this common statement.
At the very moments we were learning about the attacks, we were announcing
plans for Kansas City's first Interfaith Conference, Oct 27-28. The need
for such a conference is made even clearer by the tragic events we have
just witnessed.
We have much work to do, and that work must be guided by compassion and
understanding.
Simeon Kohlman
Rabbani—Bahá’í
Chuck Stanford—Buddhist
The Rev Rayfield
Burns (for Wallace Hartsfield)—Christian, Protestant
George M Noonan—Christian,
Roman Catholic
Anand Bhattacharyya—Hindu
Rabbi Joshua
Taub—Jewish
A Rauf Mir,
MD—Muslim
Karta Purkh
S Khalsa—Sikh
Ali Kadr—Sufi
Kathy Reigelman—Unitarian
Universalist
Mike Nichols—Wiccan
Daryoush Jahanian,
MD—Zoroastrian
Uma—Vedanta
Observer
David E Nelson—Chair
Vern Barnet—Convener
This statement was issued by
the named "members" of the Council, rather than in the name of the Council
itself, in order to respect the position of the American Indian member.
I think if you review the history and the documents, you will find meticulous
attention to avoid partisanship.
A more accurate history of
the Council than what might be inferred from the Chronicle appears at http://www.cres.org/now/ifc-hist.htm
.
It might have been helpful
if the editor, who also wrote the story, had simply refered to appropriate
documents or taken the trouble to call "Vern Barnet" who is named frequently
in the article, instead of perpetuating this misunderstanding which does
not serve the cause of interfaith understanding.
Better than hearsay are the
docments and testimony of those actually involved with CRES and the interfaith
Council, and fair and accurate reporting provides a better environment
from which the community can move forward. I, for one, would be delighted
to respond, and to supply any inquirers with any documents desired for
the preparation of a comment.
Vern Barnet
|